November 27, 2013
State Witness or Most Guilty?
Should Janet Lim-Napoles be made a state witness?
We have heard Senator Miriam Defensor Santiago repeatedly say that Janet Lim-Napoles should be because there seems to be a different person who acted as a mastermind in the perpetration of the Pork Barrel Scam.
I had the opportunity to interview Atty. Levito Baligod, whistleblower Benhur Luy’s legal counsel, on DWIZ 882khz
He said that they do not talk about these things. They don’t need her testimony any to prove the allegations against the legislators who worked with her to steal the country’s money.
We have also repeatedly heard that the state witness should be the least guilty. However, to qualify, the accused must first admit his guilt.
ATTY. BALIGOD: Yung requirement po ng batas ay dapat hindi siya ang most guilty. Nakikita po kasi natin na si Mrs. Napoles ay isa sa most guilty. Ang nakikita ko po ay tatlo ang partido na mayroong indispensable cooperation para magawa ang pagnanakaw ng pera ng bayan.
(The law requires that she not be the most guilty. But we are seeing that she is one of the most guilty. I see that there are three parties working with indispensable cooperation to steal from the people.)
Those who are said to be the most guilty are: (1) the legislator; (2) Mrs. Napoles; and (3) the implementing agencies. If one of these three did not fulfill what was needed of them, then no scam would have been carried out.
For example, if a legislator did not release his PDAF to a Napoles NGO then the scam would not be started.
If Mrs. Napoles had not been there, no NGO would have been available for use. If the implementing agency had not cooperated, then the scam wouldn’t have been completed.
ATTY. BALIGOD: Principal by indispensable cooperation. Ang tatlo na iyan ay principal by indispensable cooperation, so si Ginang Napoles ay isa sa most guilty. Pero kung may maipapakita silang ebidensiya para ma-meet nila ang requirement ng batas ay hindi po kami kokontra.
(Principal by indispensable cooperation. All these three parties are connected by this so Mrs. Napoles is one of the most guilty. But if they can show us evidence that will meet the requirements of law, we will not object.)
The talk of turning Napoles into a state witness started when Senator Miriam said that there must be a different mastermind.
ATTY. BALIGOD: Eh hindi naman po maaring si Sen. Enrile ang utak ng kabuuang P10 billion scam na iyan dahil wala naman siyang control sa PDAF ng ibang legislator.
(Sen. Enrile cannot possibly the mastermind of the entire P10 billion scam because he has no control over the PDAF of other legislators.)
The Ombudsman has not allowed clippings that are dilatory in nature. She does not take motions for appeal or to dismiss for particulars.
The Office of the Ombudsman seems decided to not let anything delay their proceedings. They aim to finish their case by the first quarter of next year.
Meanwhile, as I write (November 27) this column, many are awaiting the privilege speech of Senate Minority Floor Leader Juan Ponce Enrile.
The center of this speech is the report of Philippine Daily Inquirer that he is the one whom the Ombudsman is referring to as the mastermind of the Pork Barrel Scam. Ombudsman Conchita Carpio-Morales has denied this.
The Ombudsman is also believed to be ready to file its second batch of cases against legislators involved in the Pork Barrel Scam.
In the world of cinema, this is called a Double Program.
WATCH OUT FOR IT!
Photo credit: UAA Justice Center for Students
Photo/s used in this post is/are covered under the Fair Use Exemption of the IP Code.
- You acknowledge that Manila Speak is only a platform for your views and opinions and those views and opinions of yours are not necessarily that of Manila Speak.
- The comments section is a public forum and you will be considerate and respectful at all times.
- You shall not post any defamatory utterances, profanity or vulgar language, anything that is obscene or abusive. You shall not post any false statements, harassing words or threaten a person’s safety or property.
- You shall not, without consent, post any personal information such as but not limited to phone numbers and email or mailing addresses.
- You shall not violate other’s intellectual property or proprietary rights.
- Manila Speak may or may not review your post but it reserves the right to remove that same if such post may potentially violate the guidelines.
- All Rights Reserved. No portion of this site may be republished without permission of the publisher.